Munro v. Atwood: Nobel for whom
Aug. 20th, 2007 03:09 pmAm reading Dance of the Happy Shades (1968), Alice Munro's first collection of short stories. For those unfamiliar, Munro works exclusively as a short story writer, have only published one very short story collection-ish novel in her 40 year career. Many consider the best living short fiction writer in English. As something of a fan of the genre, I agreed. Heartily.
In Can-Lit circles however, Margaret Atwood is considered by many to be Canada's greatest living fiction writer. Having read several of her books I'm inclined to say...not. She is a great writer: witty, clever, entertaining even. But I think the only reasons Peggy (as Atwood is allegedly know to friends) is of a somewhat higher profile are:
-she writes lit crit and poetry in addition to fiction;
-she was at the vanguard of second wave feminism;
-she garnered more capital outside Canada than inside for many years; and
-Can-Lit circles largely view short stories as the lesser version of "real" fiction
So I suspect--as do many--that the Can-Lit (even Commonwealth Lit) sphere is obsessed with Peggy, leaving Alice quietly writing better fiction. And unless there's a shift away from the Atwood=Can-Lit reduction - by winning or by people deciding she ain't never gonna get it - where will support for Munro come from? Because you and I can't nominate anyone for a Nobel; nominators are a rarified breed. The Establishment, in other words.
But as I read what is probably her earliest, roughest work, I remain impressed. Munro squeezes a whole novel into each story. They're readable, insightful, wry and credible. It's no surprise that one of her stories - The Bear Came Down from the Mountain - has been turned into an equally brilliant 2 hour film (Away From Her). Because Munro gives us the whole package: rich description, believable dialogue, and the everywoman internal monologue that we each has, in order to make sense of the world.
So I say Alice for the 2007 Nobel Prize for Literature. Nominate her for the next 3 years: if she doesn't win, we'll give Peggy another crack.
In Can-Lit circles however, Margaret Atwood is considered by many to be Canada's greatest living fiction writer. Having read several of her books I'm inclined to say...not. She is a great writer: witty, clever, entertaining even. But I think the only reasons Peggy (as Atwood is allegedly know to friends) is of a somewhat higher profile are:
-she writes lit crit and poetry in addition to fiction;
-she was at the vanguard of second wave feminism;
-she garnered more capital outside Canada than inside for many years; and
-Can-Lit circles largely view short stories as the lesser version of "real" fiction
So I suspect--as do many--that the Can-Lit (even Commonwealth Lit) sphere is obsessed with Peggy, leaving Alice quietly writing better fiction. And unless there's a shift away from the Atwood=Can-Lit reduction - by winning or by people deciding she ain't never gonna get it - where will support for Munro come from? Because you and I can't nominate anyone for a Nobel; nominators are a rarified breed. The Establishment, in other words.
But as I read what is probably her earliest, roughest work, I remain impressed. Munro squeezes a whole novel into each story. They're readable, insightful, wry and credible. It's no surprise that one of her stories - The Bear Came Down from the Mountain - has been turned into an equally brilliant 2 hour film (Away From Her). Because Munro gives us the whole package: rich description, believable dialogue, and the everywoman internal monologue that we each has, in order to make sense of the world.
So I say Alice for the 2007 Nobel Prize for Literature. Nominate her for the next 3 years: if she doesn't win, we'll give Peggy another crack.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-20 10:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-20 11:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-20 11:15 pm (UTC)And, really, it's all about Alice's short stories. Amazing.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-20 11:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-21 02:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-21 02:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-21 03:37 am (UTC)As for the Peggy/Alice debate, Pegs is more known outside of Canada. This can actually work against her, as Nobel has chosen the more obscure of late. Not to say undeserving, but unknown outside their own language and culture. This therefore makes Alice a better bet.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-21 04:11 am (UTC)But who would nominate Alice though, outside of Canada?
no subject
Date: 2007-08-21 04:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-21 04:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-21 08:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-21 09:05 pm (UTC)I've added you as a friend.
I promise to stalk quietly.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-21 09:50 pm (UTC)From America
Date: 2007-08-23 03:14 am (UTC)Re: From America
Date: 2007-08-23 04:54 pm (UTC)I'd suggest reading some Atwood, she is very good. Cat's Eye is the novel where she found her heart (without losing her feminist gaze). The Blind Assasin and Alias Grace are also excellent. I've not ready of of her future-tripping stuff (don't like the genre, save Douglas Adams), but many folks rave about her sci-fi-ish stuff.