![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
jawnbcOn a roll, what the heck...
My EQ is 59: I have "an above average ability for understanding how other people feel and responding appropriately." I also "know how to treat people with care and sensitivity." Most women score about 47; most men about 42.
My SQ is 42: I have "an above average ability for analyzing and exploring a system. On average, women score about 24 and men score about 30. Most people with Asperger Syndrome or high functioning autism score between 40 and 50.
Which makes me a Type B (balanced) personality.
Aspergers? Hmmmmm
My EQ is 59: I have "an above average ability for understanding how other people feel and responding appropriately." I also "know how to treat people with care and sensitivity." Most women score about 47; most men about 42.
My SQ is 42: I have "an above average ability for analyzing and exploring a system. On average, women score about 24 and men score about 30. Most people with Asperger Syndrome or high functioning autism score between 40 and 50.
Which makes me a Type B (balanced) personality.
Aspergers? Hmmmmm
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2003-05-28 03:16 pm (UTC)I wouldn't worry about that too much. If you actually had Aspergers, that EQ would almost certainly be a lot lower.
I've been struck on more than one occasion by how subjective and arbitrary a lot of these tests can be. I know, for example, that on simple context-free tests (such as that personality disorder one that made the rounds some months back) I score highly for diagnoses which my shrink has never seriously considered, because the symptoms are actually well-explained by my battle with depression.
Food for thought, anyway.