On the fight for same-sex marriage rights
Jul. 27th, 2006 04:56 pmWow.
thornyc's pledge on marriage rights has brought out a lot of passion on here. In good and bad ways. That's LiveJournal for you.
Some seem to think that those of us who have already married have abandoned those who can't. We haven't...and for us to not marry would have only given more power to the bastards. Our marriages in fact are the sort of tangible evidence that the advent of same-sex marriage is only a good thing. For everyone. Feel free to point North (and towards Europe. And Massachusetts) to support your case. Please exploit us.
Some also interpret some of our sensitivities to our str8 allies as being "Uncle Toms", or sell outs, or losers, or what have you. I have done my share of screaming and shrieking and stopping traffic and getting on telly and writing stroppy letters. All of which can be very effective...in shutting down the vitriolic, nasty homophobes. I'm not currently interested in that aspect of the work--though I will always support those who are, so long as they remain non-violent. I prefer to work with the soft middle: those who are unsure, or educable, or ignorant. They will respond well to engagement, talking AND listening, and the personalization of these issues. In other words, knowing and liking someone affected by discrimination. I am a good communicator and I like people--and think the best of most. They'll understand, eventually.
Finally, life is short. I'm looking past a rather ample gut that literally hundreds of thousands of my peers (queer men) never had a chance to get because of AIDS. Add all the people who have died young from accidents, suicide, cancer, you name it. We only have today. I don't want you to put off your dreams until tomorrow on my behalf. Fulfill them now, and actively help achieve them. Marry, build your family life, and raise your kids to see Uncle John and Max as great people and a wonderful family themselves. I'd rather you start pumping them out ASAP, to shore up our side.
There are, of course, some nasty scumbags out there who hate us. I don't hate them, but I'm mindful of them and am quite happy to go toe-to-toe with them when that's on the agenda. No problem at all. I suspect, however, I wouldn't be invited to their weddings anyway.
As for Canada and our "priviledge," we had a visionary Prime Minister named Pierre Trudeau from the late 60s to early 80s (with a couple of wee breaks). He bankrupted the country, but he also laid the groundwork for the rights I enjoy today as a queer Canadian. Even as PM it took him nearly all of his years in office to bring in a new Canadian Constitution and its Charter of Rights and Freedoms. These were written in 1981--fully 200 years after the US Constitution, and represent a much more detailed and nuanced notion of human rights. Activists fought to have sexual orientatiion in the Charter and failed. But a mechanism for "reading in" other oppressed or excluded groups into the Charter allowed for same-sex rights in Canada to progress as far as they have.
Some of us had to agitate for change. But without the Charter, it wouldn't have happened as quickly...if at all. And the lack of modern, detailed human rights mechanism is what impedes similar progress in the US, Australia and the UK. And many other places.
Let's keep talking, even arguing--if it's constructive and respectful (bitchy passive aggressive comments help no one). But let's not forget we're on the same side, even when not in total agreement. We're not the enemy...unless we let them set ourselves us as such.
Some seem to think that those of us who have already married have abandoned those who can't. We haven't...and for us to not marry would have only given more power to the bastards. Our marriages in fact are the sort of tangible evidence that the advent of same-sex marriage is only a good thing. For everyone. Feel free to point North (and towards Europe. And Massachusetts) to support your case. Please exploit us.
Some also interpret some of our sensitivities to our str8 allies as being "Uncle Toms", or sell outs, or losers, or what have you. I have done my share of screaming and shrieking and stopping traffic and getting on telly and writing stroppy letters. All of which can be very effective...in shutting down the vitriolic, nasty homophobes. I'm not currently interested in that aspect of the work--though I will always support those who are, so long as they remain non-violent. I prefer to work with the soft middle: those who are unsure, or educable, or ignorant. They will respond well to engagement, talking AND listening, and the personalization of these issues. In other words, knowing and liking someone affected by discrimination. I am a good communicator and I like people--and think the best of most. They'll understand, eventually.
Finally, life is short. I'm looking past a rather ample gut that literally hundreds of thousands of my peers (queer men) never had a chance to get because of AIDS. Add all the people who have died young from accidents, suicide, cancer, you name it. We only have today. I don't want you to put off your dreams until tomorrow on my behalf. Fulfill them now, and actively help achieve them. Marry, build your family life, and raise your kids to see Uncle John and Max as great people and a wonderful family themselves. I'd rather you start pumping them out ASAP, to shore up our side.
There are, of course, some nasty scumbags out there who hate us. I don't hate them, but I'm mindful of them and am quite happy to go toe-to-toe with them when that's on the agenda. No problem at all. I suspect, however, I wouldn't be invited to their weddings anyway.
As for Canada and our "priviledge," we had a visionary Prime Minister named Pierre Trudeau from the late 60s to early 80s (with a couple of wee breaks). He bankrupted the country, but he also laid the groundwork for the rights I enjoy today as a queer Canadian. Even as PM it took him nearly all of his years in office to bring in a new Canadian Constitution and its Charter of Rights and Freedoms. These were written in 1981--fully 200 years after the US Constitution, and represent a much more detailed and nuanced notion of human rights. Activists fought to have sexual orientatiion in the Charter and failed. But a mechanism for "reading in" other oppressed or excluded groups into the Charter allowed for same-sex rights in Canada to progress as far as they have.
Some of us had to agitate for change. But without the Charter, it wouldn't have happened as quickly...if at all. And the lack of modern, detailed human rights mechanism is what impedes similar progress in the US, Australia and the UK. And many other places.
Let's keep talking, even arguing--if it's constructive and respectful (bitchy passive aggressive comments help no one). But let's not forget we're on the same side, even when not in total agreement. We're not the enemy...unless we let them set ourselves us as such.