LJ nuttiness
Feb. 9th, 2004 12:51 pmSo how do you respond to LJ phreaks?
Not the phun, kewl, make-a-me-smile-but-really-quite-OK types . . . the scary, obsessed, cutting, mean-spirited, belligerent ones?
Is LJ for you about debate and forensics, keep things light and airy, making connections, filling voids, wasting time, using bandwith.
Why are you here? Why am <I>I</I> here?
Is anybody there, does anybody care, does anybody see what I see?
Not the phun, kewl, make-a-me-smile-but-really-quite-OK types . . . the scary, obsessed, cutting, mean-spirited, belligerent ones?
Is LJ for you about debate and forensics, keep things light and airy, making connections, filling voids, wasting time, using bandwith.
Why are you here? Why am <I>I</I> here?
Is anybody there, does anybody care, does anybody see what I see?
no subject
Date: 2004-02-08 05:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-02-08 06:14 pm (UTC)Dunno... I try to leave real freaks alone and avoid them as much as possible... but if they're beating one someone, contact the victim privately and give them support that way. Usually I put off those crazy people to be ignoramouses that just have a case keyboard courage :p
no subject
Date: 2004-02-08 06:34 pm (UTC)Some people are here to let out there anger at their mother, father, whoever has wronged them... I usually just ignore them, as tempting as it sometimes is to scream back. They scream at you because you're safe -- a stranger, not a "real person".
no subject
Date: 2004-02-08 07:35 pm (UTC)This really is a new medium. The rules are so different from anything else I've seen that I often ask myself these same questions.
My current attitude is that I'm "along for the ride". LJ "freaks" are particularly freaky because I think this environment exposes parts of us that are mutually irreconcilable, and we aren't used to facing that in other people so directly.
I have no idea of what it's "about" but it's always interesting. ;-)
no subject
Date: 2004-02-08 07:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-02-08 08:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-02-08 08:14 pm (UTC)IMO there's a certain value in seeing "what you wrote was really hurtful". Not to say it's your duty to go around correcting the uncorrected, but sometimes when it's the right person at the right moment, it gets through, and you make a postive difference. Works for me, anyway.
I filter them
Date: 2004-02-09 01:27 am (UTC)I've seen too many trolls to want to play that game.
no subject
Date: 2004-02-09 06:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-02-09 06:55 pm (UTC)While it's a nice place to read what's happening in others' lives, it's hardly journalistic in the sense that my wirebound journals are private and I have an ethical duty to protect my sources. LJ kind of flaunts that paradigm by opening your thoughts up to remarks and criticism. Hence the excitement of participating in a novel forum. But as I read more into it I find that, sometimes, and not most of the time, little flames erupt, anonymous posters make snide comments, and an otherwise congenial discourse becomes unruly.
Is LJ necessary? No. Is it fun, yes.
On the why-are-you-here topic: Friendships that began long ago continue, new nodes connected. Ugliness happens occasionally.
no subject
Date: 2004-02-09 11:27 pm (UTC)