LJ nuttiness
Feb. 9th, 2004 12:51 pmSo how do you respond to LJ phreaks?
Not the phun, kewl, make-a-me-smile-but-really-quite-OK types . . . the scary, obsessed, cutting, mean-spirited, belligerent ones?
Is LJ for you about debate and forensics, keep things light and airy, making connections, filling voids, wasting time, using bandwith.
Why are you here? Why am <I>I</I> here?
Is anybody there, does anybody care, does anybody see what I see?
Not the phun, kewl, make-a-me-smile-but-really-quite-OK types . . . the scary, obsessed, cutting, mean-spirited, belligerent ones?
Is LJ for you about debate and forensics, keep things light and airy, making connections, filling voids, wasting time, using bandwith.
Why are you here? Why am <I>I</I> here?
Is anybody there, does anybody care, does anybody see what I see?
no subject
Date: 2004-02-08 08:14 pm (UTC)IMO there's a certain value in seeing "what you wrote was really hurtful". Not to say it's your duty to go around correcting the uncorrected, but sometimes when it's the right person at the right moment, it gets through, and you make a postive difference. Works for me, anyway.