A question

[jawnbc]

OK, so if you’re a bottom [and your boyfriend’s a top], and your boyfriend sits on your--you know--one morning, and you both quite enjoy it though you won’t make it a daily event, are you still a bottom [and is he still a top]?

This is strictly hypothetical...

Comments

tops will be tops...

[wolfbear.livejournal.com]

If the theoretical BF's sexual proclivities do not change, he could still be considered a top. I enjoy an occasional hard rod up my sweet, tight, hairy lovechute but generally I prefer to be insertive.

What if someone is anally insertive, yet orally both receptive and active?

These days we're encouraged to let folks identify as they choose, and to respect those terms of identification. So a big ol' bottom may still consider himself a top, and he has every right to calls 'em as he fucks 'em.

That doesn't mean that he's not utterly deluded but, unless he's advertising for sex on Manhunt or some such, who gives a fuck what he calls himself?

Re: tops will be tops...

[jawnbc]

I'm an ex-altar boy; I like rigid, inflexible and limiting categories for human behaviour. It's gawd's natural law.