A question

[jawnbc]

OK, so if you’re a bottom [and your boyfriend’s a top], and your boyfriend sits on your--you know--one morning, and you both quite enjoy it though you won’t make it a daily event, are you still a bottom [and is he still a top]?

This is strictly hypothetical...

Comments

strictly hypothetical...

[dragonweir.livejournal.com]

Yeah sure it does Jewn, why wouldn't it :-)

Re: strictly hypothetical...

[jawnbc]

oh thank gawd

You are who you are regardless

[mattblakk.livejournal.com]

Yes, it also means that you are both more fabulous than many.

Re: You are who you are regardless

[jawnbc]

Woo hoo--we'll take fabulous for 500 Alec! BTW did the kid conk out?

[beverly-sutphin.livejournal.com]

No.This type of erratic behaviour will not be tolerated.

Please return your membership cards and your toaster oven at once.

;P

[jawnbc]

dont' be getting all hormonal on us, womb woman.

A top riding his bottom's...um...well, you know!

[darkphuque.livejournal.com]

Absolutely! Without a doubt! If the pics are any indication, you have a nice...well, you know what I am talking about. Certainly a pole of more than adequate proportions....

Its obvious Max isn't perplexed about his masculinity....more power to Ya, Max...(not to mention how jealous I am...*leer*)

A Happy New Year to you both!

Re: A top riding his bottom's...um...well, you know!

[jawnbc]

it was hypothetical. really. I sweah.

happy new year to you too

[bitterlawngnome.livejournal.com]

I always get confused about this ... is it about who puts what in whom? Or about who decides what happens and when? Or about who lets whom decide when and where things are to happen as long as they suite their agenda?

Get back to me on this, wouldja, I need to know before we hit the sack tonight.

[jawnbc]

It's all about your outfit really. I think. Or not. Hmmm

[jawnbc]

So what happened? In da sack? And BTW were you aware that Alanis Morrisette is Hungarian too? She could be your new fwend

[mathan.livejournal.com]

Does it really matter, other than you both enjoyed it? :D

For the record.. I'm more or less a "versatile top" when it comes to fucking. But you know, and it's happened recently, sometimes you get that itch than needs scratching and the only way to get it sorted is by getting someone to fuck you silly. :)

[jawnbc]

Twoo, but how come we never seek someone to fook us really clever?

[armaroundyou.livejournal.com]

That's just sick.

[jawnbc]

Yes. Yes it is.

[qbear.livejournal.com]

There once was a bottom named Broom
Who brought a top up to his room.
They argued all night
As to who had the right
To to what, and with what, and to whom.

[jawnbc]

zooom zooom zooom

[puzzld1.livejournal.com]

I think it means that you are Jawn and he is Max and that you are still finding nifty ways to do yummy things with aal of your interesting parts...shhhh...I won't tell...

[jawnbc]

Thank you for your discretion!

OK... lemme get this straight (pun intended)...

[mommybabou.livejournal.com]

Max is a

And you are...

Re: OK... lemme get this straight (pun intended)...

[jawnbc]

méchante! bête noir! trop drôle!

[shawnsyms.livejournal.com]

I've had my sexy boy put his who-who in my secret dark place. About once a year. Actually, maybe it's been two years. I liked it though!

Even though it's only theoretical, I wouldn't worry too much. I like it but it doesn't change everything in terms of what happens most of the time.

If you're worried though, maybe confine the practice to every February 29th.

[jawnbc]

Every Feb 29th? the day after my birthday? I was due on the 29th, Mum cracked herself open a day early in the hopes of avoiding a phreaky child. Thoughtful of her, but to no avail...

[drood.livejournal.com]

Bottom, eh? Pardon me while I adjust myself, here.

[jawnbc]

yeah, bottom. shocker eh?

hypotheticlly?

[arkanjil.livejournal.com]

Fie, comment slut :)

It just means you have an extra lucky boyfriend, and so does he.

Re: hypotheticlly?

[jawnbc]

thanks. and yeah, I was pandering for the comments. Guilty, guilty you found me...

tops will be tops...

[wolfbear.livejournal.com]

If the theoretical BF's sexual proclivities do not change, he could still be considered a top. I enjoy an occasional hard rod up my sweet, tight, hairy lovechute but generally I prefer to be insertive.

What if someone is anally insertive, yet orally both receptive and active?

These days we're encouraged to let folks identify as they choose, and to respect those terms of identification. So a big ol' bottom may still consider himself a top, and he has every right to calls 'em as he fucks 'em.

That doesn't mean that he's not utterly deluded but, unless he's advertising for sex on Manhunt or some such, who gives a fuck what he calls himself?

Re: tops will be tops...

[jawnbc]

I'm an ex-altar boy; I like rigid, inflexible and limiting categories for human behaviour. It's gawd's natural law.

Hypothetically?

[danbearnyc.livejournal.com]

I'd say it makes you a braggart.

Hiss. Grrr. Hiss.

Re: Hypothetically?

[jawnbc]

ah jaysus fook awf woudja evah?

[art-thirst.livejournal.com]

The whole top/bottom thing is annoying and confusing to me. The only person I ever kicked out of my bed was one that wouldn't *roll over*. Whatever is enjoyed by both is good enough for me. One thing that's always baffled me in a bar or situation of just meeting, do I ask if he's a top/bottom or versatile? Gawd, that's too awkward for me... too embarrassing, too. ;-)

[jawnbc]

all twoo, but were I to hook up with someone as bottomesque as me, we'd be like two turtles in bed: both on our backs, legs a-kickin', not much else happening.

[quirkstreet.livejournal.com]

I'm totally unqualified to answer this question, as I expect either you or Max could probably get me to do pretty much anything, in whatever capacity. I'm not top, bottom, or even versatile, apparently, even though others have applied all those words to me. I'm just willing.

Your rigid altar-boy categories are almost as pretty as your other rigid things.

[jawnbc]

thtop it!
*giggle*